| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
DanaEmployee#45 Member


Joined: 11 Dec 2006 Posts: 86 Location: Auburn Hills Michigan
|
Posted: Sat Jul 21, 2007 10:48 am Post subject: The Votes Are In |
|
|
After last Sundays important meetings with the unions the votes are in for Auburn Hills and Rochester Michigan facilities.
Auburn Hills Michigan
Yes 102
No 2
Rochester Michigan
Yes 36
No 0
This will be updated as the rest of the votes are counted. _________________ I would like to talk to other Dana employees from any facility within the U.S. and Canada. You may contact me via my e-mail or PM. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mad hungarian Member


Joined: 12 Dec 2006 Posts: 220 Location: " I'M NOT A CRIMINAL"
|
Posted: Sat Jul 21, 2007 12:54 pm Post subject: Re: The Votes Are In |
|
|
| DanaEmployee#45 wrote: | After last Sundays important meetings with the unions the votes are in for Auburn Hills and Rochester Michigan facilities.
Auburn Hills Michigan
Yes 102
No 2
Rochester Michigan
Yes 36
No 0
This will be updated as the rest of the votes are counted. |
no surprise to hear this from the employee's from auburn hills,michigan went you running scare.went i watch the employee's on the floor being harass and the union willn't support them. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
subassemblythorold Member


Joined: 16 Jan 2007 Posts: 79 Location: St Catharines Ontario
|
Posted: Sat Jul 21, 2007 2:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
maybe you should all get together and give your union dues to charity instead of the UAW coffers . they might get the hint , on second thought they might not, seems the UAW doesn't give a f- - k about anyone in the supply parts industry as we all well know. Even the CAW idiot Buzz Hargrove is the same way.
The only way the supply industry will get any kind of support is when the head of the UAW or CAW once worked in our part of the industry (which i don't see Hell freezing over any time soon) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mad hungarian Member


Joined: 12 Dec 2006 Posts: 220 Location: " I'M NOT A CRIMINAL"
|
Posted: Sat Jul 21, 2007 3:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| subassemblythorold wrote: | maybe you should all get together and give your union dues to charity instead of the UAW coffers . they might get the hint , on second thought they might not, seems the UAW doesn't give a f- - k about anyone in the supply parts industry as we all well know. Even the CAW idiot Buzz Hargrove is the same way.
The only way the supply industry will get any kind of support is when the head of the UAW or CAW once worked in our part of the industry (which i don't see Hell freezing over any time soon) |
well subassemblythorold let me tell you about some of the employee's at auburn hills,mi you wave some money in front of their guys you will see them selling out their souls. when some of the employee's saw the $1000.00 signing bonus mothers was up for sell.some guys bag for loose changes or pennies.so i knew this was going vote yes.now the employee's will have to live with for the next four years.about 1979 i was listening to a man talking about how big business was going to broke down the work class worker. one step at a time and dana employee's is the first step.this will never happen to the big three worker the uaw union worker has hair on this balls. the supplies willn't stand up for the fellow worker.SCARE. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
subassemblythorold Member


Joined: 16 Jan 2007 Posts: 79 Location: St Catharines Ontario
|
Posted: Sat Jul 21, 2007 4:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Ever since that cr-p of the signing bonus came about workers grabbed it with both hands,In thorold it was $750 signing bonus and that was all there was and they took it and no doubt it was spent in one day
So for thorold $750.00 over 3 years which is 6240 hours (based on a 40 hour week) it works out to 12 cents an hour raise.
If that had at least been a raise put into the base rate it would have given a person 18 cents an hour on saturday and 24 cents an hour on sunday and the same for working 12 hour shifts,the first 3 hours is 18 cents and the last hour is 24 cents.At least if it was in the base rate the $750 bucks might have gotten you another 4 or 5 hundred more over 3 years.
Anyway no one thinks anymore just take the money and run. And yes the big 3 are all that matters to the union boys.We don't even exist in their world.Were like the the third world peons (Do your F--ing job and shut the F- -k up) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
cmueller Member


Joined: 15 Aug 2006 Posts: 22 Location: lima,ohio
|
Posted: Sat Jul 21, 2007 6:56 pm Post subject: Any one know Limas Numbers? |
|
|
| I think they counted our votes today anyone know the results? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
DanaEmployee#45 Member


Joined: 11 Dec 2006 Posts: 86 Location: Auburn Hills Michigan
|
Posted: Sun Jul 22, 2007 2:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
| mad hungarian wrote: | | subassemblythorold wrote: | maybe you should all get together and give your union dues to charity instead of the UAW coffers . they might get the hint , on second thought they might not, seems the UAW doesn't give a f- - k about anyone in the supply parts industry as we all well know. Even the CAW idiot Buzz Hargrove is the same way.
The only way the supply industry will get any kind of support is when the head of the UAW or CAW once worked in our part of the industry (which i don't see Hell freezing over any time soon) |
well subassemblythorold let me tell you about some of the employee's at auburn hills,mi you wave some money in front of their guys you will see them selling out their souls. when some of the employee's saw the $1000.00 signing bonus mothers was up for sell.some guys bag for loose changes or pennies.so i knew this was going vote yes.now the employee's will have to live with for the next four years.about 1979 i was listening to a man talking about how big business was going to broke down the work class worker. one step at a time and dana employee's is the first step.this will never happen to the big three worker the uaw union worker has hair on this balls. the supplies willn't stand up for the fellow worker.SCARE. |
WOW! My head really hurts, I mean how many times did I torture myself trying to comprehend the worlds longest run on sentence. _________________ I would like to talk to other Dana employees from any facility within the U.S. and Canada. You may contact me via my e-mail or PM. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Pyro Member

Joined: 18 Dec 2006 Posts: 22 Location: Marion, IN
|
Posted: Sun Jul 22, 2007 6:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
Local Dana workers veto pact
Companywide results of vote on plan pending
BY SEAN F. DRISCOLL
sdriscol@marion.gannett.com
Marion's Dana workers have voted against a plan hatched as part of bankruptcy proceedings that would eliminate some local jobs but keep the plant open until 2011.
Members of United Steelworkers Local 7-113, the union that represents 330 Marion Dana workers, rejected the deal by a 56 percent margin. Local President Willie Campbell said about 290 members voted, or about 88 percent.
"This plant was scheduled for shutdown, and we were able to save the plant," an angry Campbell said Friday night. "This makes no sense to me. It seems they don't want to work."
Voting results weren't available late Friday for other plants, which are represented by USW and United Auto Workers. A federal bankruptcy court judge must review the agreement; a hearing is scheduled for Wednesday on the matter.
Campbell said regardless of how other plants vote, Marion's rejection of the proposal could spell trouble.
"It's going to have an impact," he said. "If the rest of the plants turn it down, (the judge) is going to void our contracts. These people will be left with no benefits, and we'll be shut down. It's a bad situation. We tried to make the best of a bad situation, and it's not the end result we wanted.
"It just doesn't look good on the local plant," he continued. "How's the company going to be responsive to any requests or try to help us when we don't help ourselves?"
The contract was hammered out after Dana asked U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Burton Lifland to void its collective bargaining agreements. Dana plants across the country, including Marion's, voted to strike if that happened.
The plan announced earlier this month calls for a proposed loss of manufacturing jobs that would cut the Marion work force to about 170 employees, or half its current level. The agreements allow the heavy manufacturing work to move as soon as Nov. 1, but Campbell has said he thought it could take more than a year to make the change.
A special voluntary buyout program was proposed for the Marion plant to help reduce the work force. Employees would need at least one year of seniority and be union members to be eligible. If they participate, they would receive a one-time payment equal to 52 weeks of pay at the base rate.
Although buyouts would be offered under the plan, Dana officials would still be able to lay off employees as the manufacturing work is moved.
Now, though, the whole plan is in doubt. According to an article in the Toledo Blade, if even one plant rejects the proposal, it can't be considered accepted no matter what the other votes show.
If the union rejects the plan, it's unclear what the bankruptcy judge will do with the proposal before him.
Dana employee Frank Chester declined to say how he voted, but he did say he was surprised at the outcome.
"From past contracts we've had, a lot of them should have been turned down in the first place, but they passed," he said. "With this being a bankruptcy and pretty much a take-it-or-leave-it situation, I figured people would have taken it. But, evidently, they still feel strongly enough that they felt it was wrong to take it."
Chester said many people at the plant were worried Friday about what would happen if Marion rejected the contract and other plants accepted it.
"It's going to be interesting as far as what's going to happen and how the judge is going to view it," he said. "I'm just happy to still have a job for now."
Originally published July 21, 2007
Marion Chronicle-Tribune |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
subassemblythorold Member


Joined: 16 Jan 2007 Posts: 79 Location: St Catharines Ontario
|
Posted: Sun Jul 22, 2007 8:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
I see some people got the guts to stand pat.Mr. Campbell bankruptcy or not ,if the members dont like whats there then get the hell back to the job your assigned to do and get a better deal and stop the bit-hing.Dana has lots of money even though their in bankruptcy. And what about those that have to loose their jobs.Everyone works or or everyone goe's, There IS life after Dana.
I don't see them shutting down the plant because of a no vote. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
hayesdanaman Member


Joined: 14 Mar 2006 Posts: 225 Location: Thorold ont canada
|
Posted: Sun Jul 22, 2007 9:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
Wish our union members had the ball to do that the last 3 of our contracts preceding the plant closure.Everyone takes the FIRST damn offer on the table and we know the corporationd always have a second offer incase the first is rejected.
Anyone who thinks their doing the Company a favor by taking their offer is sadly mistaken. Dana will screw you if need be in the future faster than you can spit! And we all know that through out Dana weather it's Canada the U.K. Australia or the U.S.
And when they emerge from bankruptcy they will make money hand over fist , This is all designed to make Dana more than they did before,so get as much as you can get now!
Remember the more you have now,means when Dana starts taking away later on it will not hurt as much as when you got little and they take much! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mad hungarian Member


Joined: 12 Dec 2006 Posts: 220 Location: " I'M NOT A CRIMINAL"
|
Posted: Sun Jul 22, 2007 2:21 pm Post subject: no balls |
|
|
| hayesdanaman wrote: | Wish our union members had the ball to do that the last 3 of our contracts preceding the plant closure.Everyone takes the FIRST damn offer on the table and we know the corporationd always have a second offer incase the first is rejected.
Anyone who thinks their doing the Company a favor by taking their offer is sadly mistaken. Dana will screw you if need be in the future faster than you can spit! And we all know that through out Dana weather it's Canada the U.K. Australia or the U.S.
And when they emerge from bankruptcy they will make money hand over fist , This is all designed to make Dana more than they did before,so get as much as you can get now!
Remember the more you have now,means when Dana starts taking away later on it will not hurt as much as when you got little and they take much! | well hayesdanaman you know how to play the game dana is doing but the young employee's are scared if the managerment ask for the first birth you know young employee's will give the first birth and the second etc. if anyone turn it down dana always has a back up offer but better. you just save dana to give you a better offer and mike burns is sitting back laughing. you stupid asses and you walked in to the trap. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
hayesdanaman Member


Joined: 14 Mar 2006 Posts: 225 Location: Thorold ont canada
|
Posted: Sun Jul 22, 2007 4:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I remember when i was younger in 1972 and green.There was already talk of shutting down one of the three plants here.Well in 1974 we voted no and had a 6 1/2 week strike.Complete with 600 on the picket line one day and the cops were there and all the newspaper reporters.there were trucks burned and bottles and rocks thrown at the railroad engine.
First and only strike I was ever in ,loved every minute of it. And if i lost my job I didn't care there were other places to work...
7 or 8 years later they closed the Hayes Forge.35 years after i started the Frame Plant went by by.That leaves the Drive Train.That has to be over 80 now or more.And one day that also will close..
I think only once I voted for a contract,to gain 180 jobs and as it turned out there was only 60 jobs.I voted strike ever since... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Grant87 Member

Joined: 17 Jun 2007 Posts: 13
|
Posted: Sun Jul 22, 2007 4:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| subassemblythorold wrote: | I see some people got the guts to stand pat.Mr. Campbell bankruptcy or not ,if the members dont like whats there then get the hell back to the job your assigned to do and get a better deal and stop the bit-hing.Dana has lots of money even though their in bankruptcy. And what about those that have to loose their jobs.Everyone works or or everyone goe's, There IS life after Dana.
I don't see them shutting down the plant because of a no vote. |
I work at Marion . I thought for sure there would be more NO Votes .
Most never have seen an actual agreement for International or local contracts.Some of us did get a copy of the international agreement off the BMC site.But I have yet to see a local contract agreement.
. We had a 3 hr meeting with the international reps .
All they did was read from the summary they passed out in the plant . They couldnt answer 90% of our questions .
so why vote yes on something you dont know what the details are ?
But mostly people were pissed that in the local agreement they put A NO FAULT ATTENDANCE POLICY ! NO DRS SLIPS ! NOT ONE !
you are allowed 40 hrs in a rolling yr before you get wrote up . No hours come off for a yr .Not a point system either time for time in tenths of an hour.The attendance policy was the main reason people voted no .
But Hey Slick Willie has 42 yrs senority and going to retire with $45,000 extra why would he care what we have to live with for four more yrs?
Why shoould people who already retired or are going to retire with full retirement get extra money?Thats another thing that really ticked people off . I know they said at one plant people felt they were made to retire ?But how do you make someone retire ?
So people who were going to anyway or have 28 yrs senority and age can retire with extra money. Most people with attendance problems will either take a buyout or get fired in the next yr .So that leaves us the people who WANT A JOB AND TO WORK getting the short end of the stick .
We have no idea EXACTLY how much our retirement will be.Doubtful we will have a veba ? And dont know if we will have a job in four yrs ?
Gee wonder how many of ALL union officials altogether will be retiring with the extra cash? Nice deal they worked our for themselves . |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
subassemblythorold Member


Joined: 16 Jan 2007 Posts: 79 Location: St Catharines Ontario
|
Posted: Sun Jul 22, 2007 6:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Some great points there,good thing it was turned down..god if the union reps are only reading a hand out where are the guys who came up with the deal?That tells me the Bargaining committee just sat at the table kept their mouths shut and let Dana Dictate everything.
Sometimes Unions are not worth their weight in Sh-t |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Pyro Member

Joined: 18 Dec 2006 Posts: 22 Location: Marion, IN
|
Posted: Sun Jul 22, 2007 6:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | Most never have seen an actual agreement for International or local contracts.Some of us did get a copy of the international agreement off the BMC site.But I have yet to see a local contract agreement.
. We had a 3 hr meeting with the international reps .
All they did was read from the summary they passed out in the plant . They couldnt answer 90% of our questions .
so why vote yes on something you dont know what the details are ?
But mostly people were pissed that in the local agreement they put A NO FAULT ATTENDANCE POLICY ! NO DRS SLIPS ! NOT ONE !
you are allowed 40 hrs in a rolling yr before you get wrote up . No hours come off for a yr .Not a point system either time for time in tenths of an hour.The attendance policy was the main reason people voted no . |
Those are the reasons I voted no.
If you read the article from what the local pres said. Now that is the way for a union pres to stand up for his membership. About half of the committee that brought it back said they could not vote for it. One guy with well over thirty years that never misses work said he could not vote that. He also said we paid for them to go up there for weeks and still cannot answer any questions. Then the international reps that we pay still could not answer any questions.
So who is the bigger liar Dana or the international unions? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|